913 So. 2d 1220 - Sapp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State · 313 So. 2d 666 - Simkins Industries, Inc. v. Moreira · Griffin v. State · 4 Ill. App. 3d 522 - People v. Bembroy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If there is competent substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, the trial court's denial of the motion will not be disturbed on appeal. In reviewing the trial court's denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal, the appellate court must follow the well settled principle that a defendant, in moving for a judgment of acquittal, admits all facts adduced in evidence, and the court draws every conclusion favorable to the state which is fairly and reasonably inferable from that evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.