Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

913 So. 2d 579

913 So.2d 579

30 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 701

Crosby v. Downs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 12, 2005

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2005-10-12

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2018

10 state decisions

Relies on Reed v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), based on express and direct conflict with a decision of another district court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Clarence W. Downs has been released from custody and said release went unchallenged by the Florida Department of Corrections. The issues in the case are now moot as they apply to Downs. We exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause as moot. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

¶2It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C j., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
/913/so2d/579 · .json · Public domain