Largie v. Gregorian’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 679 So. 2d 278 - Kukral v. Mekras · 633 So. 2d 9 - Patry v. Capps · Ingersoll v. Hoffman · 595 So. 2d 136 - Stebilla v. Mussallem · 588 So. 2d 982 - Williams v. Campagnulo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t ma[de] no reference to the standard of care applicable to a certified registered nurse practitioner or to any deviation from that standard of care; and, it d[id] not suggest, much less corroborate, that any investigation took place with regard to [the nurse] or that any reasonable grounds exist to support the [plaintiffs'] claim against her as expressly mandated by Chapter 766.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“that an attorney has reviewed the case against each and every potential defendant and has consulted with a medical expert and has obtained a written opinion from said expert”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In interpreting the Medical Malpractice Act, we are guided by legislative intent. But in doing so, we begin with the proposition that the statutory medical malpractice scheme must be interpreted liberally so as not to unduly restrict a Florida citizen’s constitutionally guaranteed access to the courts, while at the same time carrying out the legislative policy of screening out frivolous lawsuits and defenses.... While it is true that the presuit requirements are conditions precedent to instituting a malpractice suit, the provisions of the statute are not intended to deny access to the courts on the basis of technicalities. [] Instead, the presuit notice and screening statute should be construed in a manner that favors access to courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.