Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 SO2D 762 - Sullivan v. State

Sullivan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 829 So. 2d 901 - Swett v. State · 864 So. 2d 1167 - Hajal v. State · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even though the lower court erred in its finding of exceptional circumstances, we conclude that we should affirm under the 'tipsy coachman' rule because the trial court reached the right conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.