Bingham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Lane v. State (1996), Paredes v. State (2004)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williamson v. United States · Boykin v. State · Hubbard v. United States · 53 Cal. 3d 1195 - People v. Sully · Vernon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense committed; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense.”). 3 . Wyatt also testified that Willis told her that “me and Trent [the appellant] killed somebody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Archie v. State“testimony” within the meaning of Article 38.14, it was not necessary for the jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maynard v. State“adduced in open court by live witnesses under oath”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Badillo v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.