Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

913 S.W.2d 344

Beishline v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-11-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-11-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2016

4 state decisions

20199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/913/sw2d/344 · .json · Public domain