Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 913 SW2D 627 - Cadle Co. v. Castle

Cadle Co. v. Castle’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (2002), Johnston v. McKinney American, Inc. (2000)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

180199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 192nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Board · Simmons v. Arnim · Roark v. Allen · Aro Corp. v. Allied Witan Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If the parties reach a settlement and execute a written agreement disposing of the dispute, the agreement is enforceable in the same manner as any other written contract. (b) The court in its discretion may incorporate the terms of the agreement in the court's final decree disposing of the case. te) A settlement agreement does not affect an outstanding court order unless the terms of the agreement are incorporated into a subsequent decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although a court cannot render a valid agreed judgment absent consent at the time it is rendered, this does not preclude the court, after proper notice and hearing, from enforcing a settlement agreement complying with Rule 11 even though one side no longer consents to the settlement. The judgment in the latter case is not an agreed judgment, but rather is a judgment enforcing a binding contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “party seeking enforcement of a written settlement agreement as a contract must support it by proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re LMM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.