United States v. Parcel of Land & Residence at 28 Emery Street’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.2d 1 · 1990
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17 (1992), United States v. Heldeman (2005)
29 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1615 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp. · Greenburg v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority · United States v. $250000 in United States Currency · United States v. Santoro · United States v. Premises Known as 3639-2nd St., N.E.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e have consistently required that there be a ‘substantial connection’ between the property forfeited and the drug activity.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“reasonable ground for belief of guilt[,] supported by less than prima facie proof but more than mere suspicion”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“that the property was not used in violation of the statute or that it was so used without the owners' knowledge or consent.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.