Anderson v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.2d 1121 · 1990
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2016
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. · Desrosiers v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Valente v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Ernest A. BRAWNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee · Viehman v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be free to disregard self-serving statements that cannot be verified, and the ALJ's assessment of credibility must be given great weight.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.