United States v. Hoyland’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.2d 1125 · 1990
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5316 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on Morissette v. United States · Marchetti v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States v. Balint · Parr v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“changed the law to make it a crime so to structure with the intent to prevent reporting.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a person acts knowingly with respect to the material elements of the offense, unless a purpose to impose further requirements appears.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Hardy · ESQUEDA“`[S]tructuring is not the kind of activity that an ordinary person would engage in innocently,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.