Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

914 F.2d 1490

Docket No. 90-6107.

Burke v. Walden

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990. Decided Sept. 25, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-09-25

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Claypool v. Boyd

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-09-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 90-79-N).

Lawrence Burke, appellant pro se.

Michael Anson Rhine, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Lawrence Burke appeals from the district court's order which granted summary judgment to defendants in his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Walden, CA-90-79-N (E.D.Va. July 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/914/f2d/1490 · .json · Public domain