Advest, Inc. v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.2d 6 · 1990
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 35 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Cole v. Burns International Security Services, Cole v. Burns Intrenational Security Services (1997)
45 federal appellate · 35 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 11 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Wilko v. Swan · United States v. Zannino · Paulussen v. Herion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) unfounded in reason and fact; (2) based on reasoning so palpably faulty that no judge, or group of judges, ever could conceivably have made such a ruling; or (3) mistakenly based on a crucial assumption that is concededly a non-fact.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“do not sit to hear claims of factual or legal error by an arbitrator as an appellate court does in reviewing decisions of lower courts,”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there must be some showing in the record, other than the result obtained, that the arbitrators knew the law and expressly disregarded it.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.