United States v. Rothman’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.2d 708 · 1990
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · United States v. Mejia-Orosco · United States v. D'Antoni · United States v. Burroughs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“occur[ ] well before the defendant or any co-conspirator ha[d] completed the necessary acts of [bribing a public official].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.