Schouest v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.2d 713 · 1990
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · Thompson v. Thompson · Connecticut Performing Arts Foundation, Inc. v. Brown · Jones v. Wj Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by allowing the state to introduce [at trial] a report of Dr. Mann without the testimony of Dr. Mann,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schouest v. Whitley“I am refiling the same grounds in order to retain my appeal rights upon an adverse decision again.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schouest v. Whitley“the factual basis supporting any claim could be gleaned from a reading of the state record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schouest v. Whitley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.