Islas-Veloz v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.3d 1249 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Padilla v. Kentucky · Jordan v. De George · 135 S. Ct. 2551 - Johnson v. United States · Chambers v. United States · Hunter v. Underwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has persisted in our immigration law since 1891, and in our common law tradition for nearly a century longer. See Julia Ann Simon-Kerr, Moral Turpitude , 2012 Utah L. Rev. 1001 , 1010, 1039. Indeed, in holding in 1951 that the term was not void for vagueness, the Supreme Court thought it”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barbosa v. Barr · Barbosa v. Barr“); Jordan v. De George , 341 U.S. 223 , 232, 71 S.Ct. 703 , 95 L.Ed. 886 (1951) (Jackson, J., dissenting) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barbosa v. Barr · Barbosa v. Barr“[d]espite many years of trying, courts and administrators have not been able to establish coherent criteria”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Barbosa v. Barr · Barbosa v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.