DeMarco v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.3d 383 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Heck v. Humphrey · Kentucky v. Graham · Turner v. Safley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must establish (1) a specific constitutional right, (2) the defendant's intent to retaliate against [him] for his ... exercise of that right, (3) a retaliatory adverse act, and (4) causation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baughman v. Hickman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.