Agustin v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.3d 43 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Zannino · 138 S. Ct. 2105 - Pereira v. Sessions · Vineberg v. Bissonnette · Lopez de Hincapie v. Gonzales · Ang v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if they are 'supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] consistent line of our precedent supports the conclusion that wealthy Guatemalans returning to Guatemala do not constitute a protected social group.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.