Singh v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
914 F.3d 654 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft · Melkonian v. Ashcroft · Nuru v. Gonzales · Almaghzar v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, the BIA reviewed the IJ's factual findings for clear error, and reviewed de novo all other issues,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“show that he more likely than not will be tortured if he returns home,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singh v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.