Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 914 P.2d 719 - Richards v. Baum

Richards v. Baum’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2025

19 state decisions

1001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crookston v. Fire Insurance Exchange · Burkett v. Schwendiman · Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co. · Behrens v. Raleigh Hills Hospital, Inc. · 87 Ill. App. 3d 615 - Horvath v. Loesch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'An appeal is moot if during the pendency of the appeal circumstances change so that the controversy is eliminated, thereby rendering the relief requested impossible or of no legal effect'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[wlhere the issues that were before the trial court no longer exist, the appellate court will not review the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “prevent the [appellee] from legally conveying the disputed land to a third party,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.