Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 708 So. 2d 18 - Underwood v. State · 790 So. 2d 773 - Conley v. State · 451 So. 2d 706 - Jesco, Inc. v. Whitehead · Strong v. State · 725 So. 2d 220 - Higgins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has held that in reviewing the denial of a jury instruction we must consider not only the denied instruction but all of the instructions which were given to ascertain if error lies in the refusal to give the requested instruction. A defendant is entitled to have instructions given which present his theory of the case; however, this entitlement is limited in that the court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in another instruction, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a state of violent and uncontrollable rage engendered by a blow or certain other provocation given, which will reduce a homicide from the grade of murder to that of manslaughter. Passion or anger suddenly aroused at the time by some immediate and reasonable provocation, by words or acts of one at the time. The term includes an emotional state of mind characterized by anger, rage, hatred, furious resentment or terror.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.