914 So. 2d 185 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Hernandez v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. That he is a member of a “cognizable racial group[”;] 2. That the proponent has exercised peremptory challenges toward the elimination of veniremen of his race; and 3. That facts and circumstances raised an inference that the proponent used his peremptory challenges for the purpose of striking minorities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has been defined as meaning an insulation from appellate reversal of any trial findings which are not clearly erroneous. ANALYSIS OF THE ISSUE ¶ 9. Ramsey asserts only one issue on appeal, which we quote verbatim:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.