Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 914 So. 2d 185 - Moore v. State

914 So. 2d 185 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Hernandez v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. That he is a member of a “cognizable racial group[”;] 2. That the proponent has exercised peremptory challenges toward the elimination of veniremen of his race; and 3. That facts and circumstances raised an inference that the proponent used his peremptory challenges for the purpose of striking minorities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “has been defined as meaning an insulation from appellate reversal of any trial findings which are not clearly erroneous. ANALYSIS OF THE ISSUE ¶ 9. Ramsey asserts only one issue on appeal, which we quote verbatim:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.