Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 914 So. 2d 27 - Thomas v. State

914 So. 2d 27 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Hughes v. State · 884 So. 2d 476 - McBride v. State · 911 So. 2d 813 - Isaac v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court of Florida held in Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837 (Fla.2005), that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), did not apply retroactively. It did not address the retroactivity of Blakely , but, on the authority above, we conclude that there is no retroactivity of this decision either. Appellant’s sentences became final in 2002, pre-Blakely but post-Apprendi Since his challenge is based on Blakely , and as it is not retroactive, we conclude that the trial court did not err in rejecting this claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.