Foley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
7
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Crawford v. Washington · Griffin v. California · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 697 So. 2d 777 - Coleman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he standard of review that appellate courts must apply to lawyer misconduct during opening statements or closing arguments is whether the natural and probable effect of the improper argument is to create unjust prejudice . . . so as to result in a decision influenced by the prejudice so created.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When reviewing a finding of probable cause to issue a warrant[,] [an appellate court] does not make a de novo determination of probable cause, but only determines if there was a substantial basis for the magistrate's determination of probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision based on all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.