Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 914 SW2D 554 - State v. Locust

State v. Locust’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Cabbage · State v. Grace · State v. Williams · State v. Sheffield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ur Court must make decisions based on matters within the record and not outside of the record. When an appellant or any “party seeks review of issues before our Court, that party must prepare a record which conveys a fair and complete account of what transpired in the trial court. If the record is incomplete, this Court is precluded from considering the issues raised.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.