State v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2016
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Place · United States v. Guzman · United States v. Stone · State v. Burkhardt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court finds that the dog’s actions were within the bounds of a proper canine sniff. In Stone , the dog jumped through a car’s open hatchback and proceeded to do a canine sniff of the car. The court held that the dog’s “instinctive actions” did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the police did not ask the Defendant to open the hatchback so the dog could jump in, nor did the police handler encourage the dog to jump in. Id. at 364 . As in Stone , this court was presented with no evidence that the dog was encouraged to jump in the car by its handler. Consequently, the court follows Stone and declares that the canine sniff of the passenger compartment was proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.