Scott v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
915 F.2d 1188 · 1990
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Derden III v. McNeel (1992), Reese v. Fulcomer (1991)
15 federal appellate · 3 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Delaware v. New York · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County · Juidice v. Vail
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cumulative error does not call for habeas relief, as each habeas claim must stand or fall on its own”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ware v. Nix · Hunt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.