Tullos v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
915 F.2d 1192 · 1990
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2015
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange · Lombard v. Marcera · Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Are the issues of fact and law raised by the claim and counterclaim largely the same? 2) Would res judicata bar a subsequent suit on defendant’s claim absent the compulsory counterclaim rule? 3) Will substantially the same evidence support or refute the plaintiffs claim as well as the defendant’s counterclaim? 4) Is there any logical relationship between the claim and the counterclaim?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o put the matter simply, all the claims asserted by both sides in this case are part of the fight between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.