Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 F.2d 394 - Hable v. Pairolero

Hable v. Pairolero’s Empirical Analysis

915 F.2d 394 · 1990

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
November 2007
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Parke-Chapley Construction Co. v. Cherrington · Malone v. Avenenti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he unique circumstances exception to rule 4(a) protects a party who reasonably relied on erroneous district court action that caused the party to file an untimely notice of appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[f]iling requirements for appeals are mandatory and jurisdictional”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.