O'Bremski v. Maass’s Empirical Analysis
915 F.2d 418 · 1990
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably James v. Borg (1994), Davis v. Woodford (2003)
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Townsend v. Sain · Rose v. Lundy · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Engle v. Isaac
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Notice' pleading is not sufficient [to avoid summary dismissal], for the petition is expected to state facts that point to a 'real possibility of constitutional error.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Geter v. Ryan K · Perkins v. Kerby“Equitable estoppel is not a claim that a state prisoner may raise in a habeas corpus proceeding in federal court. A writ of habeas corpus is available for a state prisoner “only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] habeas corpus petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing if he has alleged facts which, if proven, would entitle him to relief and he did not receive a full and fair evidentiary hearing in a state court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.