Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 F.2d 424 - Sanchez

Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
5
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 8 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Steiner v. Showboat Operating Co. (1994), Brewster v. Board of Education of the Lynwood Unified School District (1998)

9 federal appellate · 8 district · 10 state decisions

230199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Parratt v. Taylor · Boddie v. Connecticut · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by providing that an employee may be demoted for certain specified reasons, [the provision] implicitly restricted the City's authority to demote an employee to the specified reasons.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Whether working conditions were so intolerable and discriminatory as to justify a reasonable employee's decision to resign is normally a factual question for the jury.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Two well-established exceptions exist: (1) where the property deprivation is the result of random and unauthorized conduct by a state employee such that meaningful predeprivation process is not possible; or (2) where protection of the public interest requires an immediate seizure of property without a hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.