Berg’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp. (1994), Joseph Maio (2000)
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · 2 Cal. 3d 1 - Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit District · Mobil Oil Corp. v. Blanton Et Al. · Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. Handelsman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“both the protection ... afforded against potential financial loss in the future and the present peace of mind that flows from such protection,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a personal injury in the form of emotional distress, not a claim for an injury to property as section 1964(c) requires.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“injury to a valuable intangible property interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ainsworth v. Owenby · Oscar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.