Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 F.2d 480 - United States v. Walker

United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

915 F.2d 480 · 1990

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
5
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

77 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably United States v. Nordby (2000), Frazer v. United States (1994)

77 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

10201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Schmuck v. United States · Keeble v. United States · Carella v. California · Youngberg v. United States · United States v. Savinovich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [the] timeliness of the motion; (2) [the] adequacy of the court's inquiry into the defendant's complaint; and (3) whether the conflict between the defendant and his attorney was so great that it resulted in a total lack of communication preventing an adequate defense.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sufficient latitude to conduct the proper inquiry under the circumstances in each case.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is within the trial judge's discretion to deny a motion to substitute made during or on the eve of trial if the substitution would require a continuance.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.