United States v. Bagster’s Empirical Analysis
915 F.2d 607 · 1990
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably United States v. Benitez (1994), United States v. Dirden (1994)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Olson · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] complaint is insufficient, by itself, to trigger the Speedy Trial Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] person is not “arrested in connection with” a charge, within the meaning of section 3161(b) of the Speedy Trial Act, unless there is some coincidence of (1) a pending federal complaint and (2) federal custody based on that complaint. Under this rule, if a complaint is filed before federal arrest pursuant to that complaint, the Speedy Trial Act is triggered at the moment of arrest. If, on the other hand, a person is arrested and kept in custody without a warrant, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure require a “complaint [to be] filed forthwith.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 5(a). The Speedy Trial Act is triggered in that circumstance when the complaint is filed while the arrestee remains in custody for the offense charged in the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.