Patton v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
915 F.3d 827 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1407 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · United States v. Zannino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We think it self-evident that a party cannot invite the trial court to employ one source of applicable law and then -- after the trial court has accepted h[er] invitation -- try to convince the court of appeals that some other source of law would be preferable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“such as whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate or whether their agreement covers a particular controversy.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.