Massieu v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 31 U.S.C. § 5316 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 703 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Kolender v. Lawson · Mistretta v. United States · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although exhaustion and finality requirements are often referred to as “jurisdictional,” they are-not unyielding. Rather, while the court’s inquiry must always be guided by the congressional intent behind the particular administrative statute, “application of the exhaustion doctrine is ‘intensely practical’ and should be guided by the policies underlying the exhaustion requirement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable grounds to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Massieu v. Reno“the purposes underlying the exhaustion requirement against the potential injury to the plaintiff if he is forced to exhaust his administrative remedies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Massieu v. Reno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.