Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 P.2d 932 - Kane v. State

Kane v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2024

9 state decisions

301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Halper · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch · State v. Toyomura · State v. Higa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Double jeopardy protects against (a) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; (b) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction; and (c) multiple punishments for the same offense .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. FRANCIS v. STATE · 2020 OK CR 16 - KNAPPER v. STATE
  2. “license revocation would constitute multiple punishment if: (1) the State subjected the defendant to separate proceedings; (2) the conduct precipitating the separate proceedings consisted of one offense; and (3) the penalties in each of the proceedings could be considered `punishment' for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Kauble
  3. “the legitimate nonpunitive purpose of protecting the public from the dangers presented by drunk drivers and helps enforce regulatory compliance with the laws governing the licensed activity of driving.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Kauble

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.