915 So. 2d 508 - Guy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “All defendants were sued in their capacity as employees of the South Mississippi Correctional Institute (SMCI) which is located in Greene County. Venue is appropriate in the county in which a defendant resides. Miss.Code Ann. § 11-11-3 (Rev.2004). Therefore, the Circuit Court of Greene County was the appropriate venue for Guy's petition.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Putnam v. Epps · 984 So. 2d 1089 - Stokes v. State

2. “No state court shall entertain an offender’s grievance or complaint which falls under the purview of the administrative review procedure unless and until such offender shall have exhausted the remedies as provided in such procedure. If at the time the petition is filed the administrative review process has not yet been completed, the court shall stay the proceedings for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days to allow for completion of the procedure and exhaustion of the remedies thereunder.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Henley v. Epps

3. “[p]ost-conviction matters address issues related to the prisoner's conviction that were not addressed at the time of judgment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 966 So. 2d 839 - Horton v. Epps