Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 SW2D 120 - Brosky v. State

Brosky v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2011

14 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Pereira v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Roberts v. United States Jaycees · Doerr v. Doerr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense committed; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. In Re MER

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.