¶1 This is an appeal of a turnover order. The only issue on appeal is the turnover order’s attorney’s fees award, which the court of appeals affirmed. 897 S.W.2d 825. On rehearing, the court of appeals reversed the judgment on which the turnover order is based. See Matthiessen v. Schaefer, 900 S.W.2d 792, 798 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1995, writ denied). Today, we denied application for writ of error in that case. If the underlying judgment is reversed on appeal, then the turnover order must be reversed also. See Enis v. Smith, 883 S.W.2d 662, 663 (Tex.1994). Without hearing argument, a majority of the court grants writ of error, reverses the judgment of the court of appeals, and renders judgment that Schaefer take nothing by the turnover proceeding. Tex.R.App.P. 170.
915 S.W.2d 479
Matthiessen v. Schaefer
Decided March 7, 1996
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1996-03-07
Relies on Matthiessen v. Schaefer · Matthiessen v. Schaefer · Enis v. Smith
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-03-07
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →