Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 S.W.2d 653 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2011

13 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 228th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Roy v. Gravel · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · City of Long Beach v. Southwest Aircraft Services, Inc. · Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person is aware of, but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor’s standpoint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person acts with criminal negligence, or is criminally negligent, with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor’s standpoint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.