Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 915 SW2D 834 - Colella v. State

Colella v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Jones v. State (1996), Green v. State (1996)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

180199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Penry v. Lynaugh · Adams v. Texas · Morgan v. Illinois · Yagow v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n Texas, this mitigating evidence is admissible at the punishment phase of a capital murder trial. Once admitted, the jury may then give it weight, if in their individual minds it is appropriate, when answering the questions which determine sentence. However, “[t]he amount of weight that the factfinder might give any particular piece of mitigating evidence is left to ‘the range of judgment and discretion’ exercised by each juror.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because the weighing of 'mitigating evidence' is a subjective determination undertaken by each individual juror, we decline to review the evidence for sufficiency”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.