Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 F.2d 175 - United States v. Werner

United States v. Werner’s Empirical Analysis

916 F.2d 175 · 1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2014

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Olson · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · White v. Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]ublic confidence in the fairness of a proceeding is important at all levels, including local tribunals established to determine just compensation following condemnation of property pursuant to the government's eminent domain power.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a new determination of [just] compensation,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he primary task of a land commission is to determine the value of the land on the date of taking. As with the factual findings of special masters, factual findings made by a land commission as to the value of the land are reviewable under the clearly erroneous standard, (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.