Hernandez v. Garrison’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.2d 291 · 1990
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2017
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Harris v. Nelson · Hopkins v. Arizona Department of Real Estate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his type of injunctive relief is not a proper subject for a habeas corpus petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“he was prejudiced by his inability to amend his petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.