Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 F.2d 423 - Stenzel v. Ellis

Stenzel v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

916 F.2d 423 · 1990

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably Hudson v. McMillian (1992), Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent (1993)

18 federal appellate · 2 district ·

190199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Hewitt v. Helms · Whitley v. Albers · Johnson v. Glick · Lee v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the need for force; the correlation between the need for force and the amount of force used; the extent of the injury; “the threat to the safety of staff and inmates, as reasonably perceived by the responsible officials on the basis of the facts known to them”; and any attempt to “temper the severity” of the response.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “inflicted unnecessary and wanton pain and suffering”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.