Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 F.2d 69 - Mrs Jc v. Wheaton

Mrs Jc v. Wheaton’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 21 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Carlisle Area School v. Scott P. ex rel. Bess P. (1995), JD v. Pawlet School District (2000)

4 federal appellate · 21 district · 9 state decisions

290199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Zinermon v. Burch · Honig v. Doe · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “he is 'otherwise qualified' for the program”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “procedural violations, his claim for compensatory education was properly dismissed. 5 Garro also argues that the district court erred in dismissing any of his claims against the state defendants based on Eleventh Amendment immunity, because Congress's 1990 amendments to the IDEA expressly abrogated states' sovereign immunity in IDEA cases. However, as Garro concedes, the amendment waiving immunity applies by its own terms only to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The [Act] provides federal funds to states that promise to provide at minimum a `free appropriate public education' for all handicapped children within the state . . . Connecticut has chosen to participate in the [Act] and has enacted legislation to implement the Act's requirements. See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-76h .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.