United States v. Grundhoefer’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.2d 788 · 1990
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably United States v. Seligsohn (1992), United States v. Perry (2004)
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 20 U.S.C. § 1070 (Persian Gulf Conflict Higher Education Assistance Act)
Relies on Allen v. Wright · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Flast v. Cohen · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Whitmore v. Arkansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he direct, distinct and palpable injury in a criminal sentencing proceeding plainly falls only on the defendant who is being sentenced. It is the defendant and he alone that suffers the direct consequences of a criminal ... sentence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the plaintiff's interests are so marginally related to or inconsistent with the purposes implicit in the statute that it cannot reasonably be assumed that Congress intended to permit the suit. The test is not meant to be especially demanding....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'within the zone of interests' protected by the federal law invoked.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.