Al-Tamimi v. Adelson’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.3d 1 · 2019
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 8 U.S.C. § 1189 (§ 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Baker v. Carr · Allen v. Wright · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party forfeits an argument by failing to raise it in his opening brief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Mentioning an argument 'in the most skeletal way, leaving the court to do counsel's work, ... and put flesh on its bones' is tantamount to failing to raise it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.