Pereida v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.3d 1128 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on 195 L. Ed. 2d 604 - Mathis v. United States · Moncrieffe v. Holder · Moncrieffe v. Holder · Octavia Beltran-Tirado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Guardado-Garcia v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inherently base, vile, or depraved, and contrary to accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between persons or to society in general.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyna v. Barr“an inconclusive record is insufficient to satisfy a noncitizen's burden of proving eligibility for discretionary relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marinelarena v. Barr“no indication of the subsection of the statute under which [the alien] was convicted,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marinelarena v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.