Arrey v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.3d 1149 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1362 (§ 292 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ungar v. Sarafite · Gonzales v. Thomas · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Melkonian v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]etermining whether the firm resettlement rule applies involves a two-step process: First, the government presents 'evidence of an offer of some type of permanent resettlement,' and then, second, 'the burden shifts to the applicant to show that the nature of his [or her] stay and ties was too tenuous, or the conditions of his [or her] residence too restricted, for him [or her] to be firmly resettled.' " Arrey v. Barr , 916 F.3d 1149 , 1159 (9th Cir. 2019) (alterations in original) (quoting Maharaj v. Gonzales , 450 F.3d 961 , 976-77 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc)); see also 8 C.F.R. § 208.15 . Further, because "firmly resettled aliens are by definition no longer subject to persecution,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“stay and ties [were not] too tenuous, or the conditions of his [or her] residence too restricted, for him [or her] to be firmly resettled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[F]irmly resettled aliens are by definition no longer subject to persecution ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.