Spreitz v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.3d 1262 · 2019
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence regarding [the defendant's] history of alcohol and substance abuse-spanning nearly half his life by the time when he committed the crime at the age twenty-two.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. Ryan“decision ... was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Djerf v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.